Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:43

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Denise Austin’s 5 Habits to Tackle Stubborn Belly Fat - Eat This Not That
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail - ScienceAlert
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Top 10 Cable TV Networks Most Likely to Shutdown As of June 2025 - | Cord Cutters News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Which sunblock is best for oily skin?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Russell takes win in Canada as Piastri and Norris collide - Formula 1